Logo
NeoArc Studio

Architecture Review Process Template

Defining when and how architecture is assessed without the review process becoming a delivery blocker

The Architecture Review Process template provides a structured approach to defining when and how architecture is assessed without the review process becoming a delivery blocker.

Template Sections

This template includes 7 sections.

Review Process Overview
Describe the architecture review process: the types of review (lightweight, standard, deep), the triggers for each, and...
Architecture Review Process Diagram
Diagram section
Review Criteria Checklist
Define what is assessed in each review type: alignment with principles, compliance with standards, security posture,...
Review Quality Gates
Define the quality gates for each review outcome: what must pass for approval, what conditions can be attached, and...
Review RACI
Map who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for each review type: the reviewer, the reviewee, the...
Review Principles
State the review principles: reviews are collaborative not adversarial, review scope is proportionate to risk, and...
Review Process Risks
Document risks: reviews becoming bottlenecks, inconsistent review criteria, review outcomes that are ignored, and...

Section Details

Block Types Used

Content blocks used in this template
SectionBlock TypePurpose
Review Process OverviewRich TextDescribe the architecture review process: the types of review (lightweight,...
Architecture Review Process DiagramDiagramDiagram section
Review Criteria ChecklistGovernance ChecklistDefine what is assessed in each review type: alignment with principles,...
Review Quality GatesQuality GateDefine the quality gates for each review outcome: what must pass for approval,...
Review RACIRACI MatrixMap who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for each review...
Review PrinciplesPrincipleState the review principles: reviews are collaborative not adversarial, review...
Review Process RisksRiskDocument risks: reviews becoming bottlenecks, inconsistent review criteria,...

Getting Started